Can hinge epistemology close the door on epistemic relativism?

I argue that a standard formulation of hinge epistemology is host to epistemic relativism and show two leading approaches (Coliva’s acceptance account Pritchard’s non-doxastic account) are vulnerable form incommensurability leads relativism. Building on both accounts, introduce new, minimally conception hinges avoids rationally resolves disagreements. According my proposed account, putative cases resolvable: propositions the objects our belief-like attitudes revisable in virtue overarching commitment avoid systematic deception practices.